If you needed more proof that The New York Times and its fellow traveler The Washington Post are bought and paid for by the Democrat Party, look no farther than the records of the Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeffrey Epstein’s partner in crime) trial. Any newspaper worth the paper it is printed on would have gone to court the second the client list was sealed by the judge. After all, isn’t the motto of the nation’s most famous paper, “All The News That’s Fit To Print?”
In what world is the client list of the world’s most famous pimp not news…big news? Ah yes, the world of our elites, in which they protect each other from the consequences of their actions. And if those actions are a little bit of child rape? Well, they did go to Yale, so it isn’t really rape-rape!
These are not the names of the victims; these are not the names of people who were involved in the case but were not culpable. These are the names of the perpetrators of vile acts, and by sealing the records the court is complicit in their crimes. But we now know that there is a two-tiered justice system in America, and there is no crime that cannot be covered up in the interests of those elites. Sadly, there is also no crime that cannot be manufactured to punish the hoi polloi when they dare to exercise their own rights. The hundreds who are accused and the dozens in jail for the January 6th protest would certainly agree with that statement!
The Gateway Pundit Petitions Court to Unseal Epstein’s Alleged Client List [PDF download]
The Gateway Pundit has petitioned a New York federal court to unseal the suspected client list for the alleged child sex trafficking ring run by Jeffrey Epstein and associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Seeking to report on what the lawsuit called the “Epstein Client List,” The Gateway Pundit, a conservative news outlet, filed a motion on July 27 via lawyers to intervene in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case in the U.S. District Court for the District of New York.
So The New York Times sits on its hands while The Gateway Pundit does the work that real reporters used to dream about doing. This is the sort of story that makes careers, yet the lack of any interest is conspicuous. A suspicious man might think that the list of “clients” is already sitting on the desk of the managing editor of The NYT and he is carefully not using it because some of his friends are on that list. And even worse, some of those names are exactly the people he has been protecting for his entire career.
Does anyone wonder what would have happened had there been any suggestion that Donald Trump was on that list? The NYT would have put dozens of reporters on the story, hired the best legal minds in the country and would have done everything possible to unseal those documents. It would have been front page news for months.
The reality is that the “great” newspapers of America are protecting child rapists for political reasons, because they believe that the greater good is served if the left-wing politicians and philanthropists on that list will serve the progressive ideal and not be held accountable for their crimes.
