“I Dissent.”

“A man who has made no enemies is probably not a very good man.”

Antonin Scalia – 1936-2016

 

Before I get to the meat of my thoughts, let me just note with a profound sense of loss the sudden passing of Justice Antonin Scalia. Considering he was 79 years old, I suppose the word “sudden” might not be quite accurate from the standpoint of biological longevity. But in the battle for the life of the nation, his death is a surprising and altogether terrifying blow. Military metaphors abound; Wake Island, the Little Big Horn, Roark’s Drift or, please G-d, Bastogne. Antonin Scalia was one of the most consequential justices on the Supreme Court in at least a generation, not for what he did necessarily but for standing up for and not abrogating his pledge to the Constitution; something that tragically too many of his colleagues at all levels of the Judiciary have not.

“If you’re going to be a good and faithful judge, you have to resign yourself to the fact that you’re not always going to like the conclusions you reach. If you like them all the time, you’re probably doing something wrong.”

Appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1986 to succeed William Rehnquist, Scalia was the oracle of originalist and textualist thinking on the court. His opinions were tours-de-force of not only of legal wisdom but of wit, quite a bit of it scathing and some directed at his colleagues, including most memorably a withering broadside at Chief Justice John Roberts in King v. Burwell, the second Obamacare decision from 2015:

“Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State…”

Having transformed two major parts of the law, the Court today has turned its attention to a third. The Act that Congress passed makes tax credits available only on an “Exchange established by the State.” This Court, however, concludes that this limitation would prevent the rest of the Act from working as well as hoped. So it rewrites the law to make tax credits available everywhere. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare.

Perhaps the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will attain the enduring status of the Social Security Act or the Taft-Hartley Act; perhaps not. But this Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (“penalty” means tax, “further [Medicaid] payments to the State” means only incremental Medicaid payments to the State, “established by the State” means not established by the State) will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence. And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.

I dissent.

Scalia was pivotal in many landmark cases, most recently in Citizens United v. FEC and DC v. Heller. He also was in the critical 5-4 majority ruling just last week to temporarily halt President Obama’s war on coal with his so-called “clean power plan” which would have decimated cheap American energy production.  He’ll have a posthumous last hurrah next June with affirmative action in Fisher v. University of Texas, which many hope will deal a mortal blow, if not put the nail in the coffin to the policy. However, as is typical of the Left, his comments during oral arguments last December once again made the left apoplectic, as the media completely distorted and lied about the context of what he said:

Carrie Severino, chief counsel for the conservative Judicial Crisis Network and a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas, defended Scalia, saying he wasn’t implying black students are inferior.

“What Justice Scalia is referring to is the ‘mismatch theory’ popularized by Stuart Taylor and Richard Sander in their book,” she said. “The idea is that if a student is admitted to a school they are not academically prepared for then they will not perform up to their own potential. This is a theory — contested of course — but I don’t want people to get the idea that it means that all black students are not as smart as white students, or even that they are not as well prepared across the board.”

Scalia was apparently referencing a brief filed by Sander.

“Students with an interest in science who are admitted to a very competitive school via a large preference tend to drop out of the sciences at a much higher rate than do otherwise similar students who attend somewhat less competitive programs,” the brief said. “Competition mismatch appears to be a major factor in the low rate at which African-American students become scientists, despite high levels of interest in the sciences.”

Once again, 320 million Americans will wait to see how eight (Lord forbid nine) flawed people in black robes will decide how their lives will change for better or worse. Along with affirmative action, there are several critical decisions slated for this June including abortion, unions, “one person one vote” among others. That our system of government has been turned upside down and given the Judiciary immense power that it was never intended troubled Scalia greatly:

“Persuade your fellow citizens it’s a good idea and pass a law. That’s what democracy is all about. It’s not about nine superannuated judges who have been there too long, imposing these demands on society.”

And this brings me full circle to the immediate threat we face with Scalia’s passing. If Mitch McConnell allows President Obama to pick a justice to fill the vacancy, he will doubtless choose a fellow ideological traveler who will trash the Constitution or twist it for political expediency to legislate from the bench along with Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan and Breyer (and more than likely Kennedy and Roberts).  If you loved Eric Holder as Attorney General, you ain’t seen nothing yet – and for life.

If there is any sanity left in the GOP – and I have strong doubts about it – McConnell will not allow any appointee to come up for a vote, and will make sure to leave the Senate in full session and declare no recesses whatsoever. Doubtless Obama will try and pull some sort of a fast one by declaring the Senate in recess when it isn’t and illegally appointing someone.

For nearly 30 years, Antonin Scalia held the line and defended the Constitution and the rule of a just and stable law as best he could. Perhaps in the end, he was overwhelmed and could hold out no longer. I pray that his death is not a harbinger of doom but a clarion call to those who represent us to resist the onslaught on our nation and our values as Scalia did. May the next occupant of his seat on the court be just as resolute as he was.

Fare thee well, Nino.  RIP.

15 comments to ““I Dissent.””
  1. The effective block of any Obama nominee will without doubt set the GOP’s future. No oopsies, no “missed it by that much” will be concedable. Choose wisely Senate Republicans.

  2. McYertle has to keep the Senate filled with bodies until noon on 1/20/17.

    And then, I’m sure Obama is going to totally ignore it and appoint someone anyway. Even more than 7 years on, it is difficult to fathom the destruction on our system he has wrought. But you can’t have him without those who enable him, specifically the GOP Establishment.

    I am really scared of what’s coming in the next year.

  3. Recess appointments still have to be confirmed when the Senate returns, so even if Obama does do what I expect, the Senate has the final word.

    But McConnell is…shall we say….not overly blessed with balls or a love of the Constitution, so I am not confident.

  4. Short list:

    Eric Holder? Marilyn Moseby? Angela Corrie? Maybe Loretta Lynch moves on up?

    The list of potential “social” justices is deep. And with McConnell, we have precisely the wrong man at the wrong time to make the 100% wrong decision that will really suffocate what’s left of the comatose republic.

  5. J.J. Well spotted.

    I intend to do my part to slow down the complete destruction of the most revolutionary government on Earth.

    My fear is that we are already past all reconciliation. Looking at attitudes prior to the English Civil War and our own Civil War — we are there.

    Rather than fight, I would retreat. Let it burn hurts the unprepared the most. Mentally, I have consigned all my gains in life as potentially lost.

    What I want on the other side is wisdom among the survivors, I’ve been doing a lot of thinking on Republic 2.0 lately. Do you have any thoughts on that?

  6. It’s hard to think of the future or any possible future when we are staring into the abyss.

    Gaming out the next few months is hard enough, let alone 2, 3, 5 or even 10 years out. If that wasn’t bad enough, we have the external threats like Mad Vlad, the ChiComs and Imperial Islam on the march.

    Right here and now, Scalia’s death means Congress is one step away from dissolving itself, based solely on what McConnell does or does not do.

    If Obama gets a pick, it’s over. The Judiciary will rubber stamp the Executive branch and its illegal legislature, the Bureaucracy. I don’t see how a Cruz administration with a gaggle of Reagans, Polks and Coolidges overcomes that.

    Game, set, match. Goodbye America.

  7. Matt Bevin. At least he became governor, but I thought I just heard recently that he too has taken the Uncle Sugar Medicaid bribe to expand SCOTUScare.

    Very disappointing.

  8. Well, of course we still live and America will still be here. But it will be a very different America from the one say 10 years ago, let alone 30 years ago.

    Islamo/Nork ICBM’s and EMP’s notwithstanding.

  9. Actually Bevin is cutting Medicaid in KY. Doing a few other things well too. But I was more wondering who would have been the majority leader if McConnell had lost.

  10. I was under the impression that Bevin took the Medicaid lucre. I happily stand corrected if that is not the case.

    As to Cornyn, feh. A President Cruz would have as much if not more static from his own side than the Democrats.

  11. J.J. I’m not worried about EMP.

    I have considerable experience with EMP simulator testing. I wrote three magazine articles about it.

    Now, Communists in Office and no Constitution — there I worry.

    Anyone who knows the 20th Century should worry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com